{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["工作表1"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"工作表1","index":0,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
[]
["比較項目","Liferay","Sharepoint","市售EIP產品","客製化"]
["授權費","分為CE版與EE版，CE版不需授權費用。","需要授權費，資料庫、Sharepoint等加總約在數百萬。","通常在百萬上下","無授權費"]
["採用語言","Java",".Net","各有不同","可配合客戶需求。"]
["版權所有","具有使用權，無所有權。","具有使用權，無所有權。","具有使用權，無所有權。","擁有版權"]
["客製化難度","採用常用Java語法，但需要熟悉Liferay特性，相對難度低。","與一般.Net開發概念不同，具有一定難度。","需熟悉各產品不同的開發限制，難度較高。","適用一般開發方式，不具難度。"]
["客製化成本","熟悉Java的人員即可客製，相對成本較低。","需要專門人才進行維護，成本較高。","需要專門人才進行維護，成本較高。","一般開發人員即可進行客製，成本較低。"]
["資料庫使用","市售大部份的資料庫均可使用。","限定MS-SQL。","各家產品各有不同。","配合客戶需求，均可對應合適的資料庫。"]
["維護成本","熟悉Java的人員，經一定訓練均可進行維護。","市面上熟悉的人較少，且因與.Net標準開發概念落差太大，不易培養。","專屬的維護人才，維護、客製均不易培養。","標準開發方式，人員培養容易。"]
["訓練門檻","中低","高","高","低"]
["導入時程","中低","中高","中低","高"]