Add 'Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role'

2 months ago · 808d0d923f
1 changed files with 64 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/Sweepstakes-Casino-Controversy---And-Celebrities%27-All-important-Role.md
+++ b/Sweepstakes-Casino-Controversy---And-Celebrities%27-All-important-Role.md
@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
 [bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig)<br>The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gaming.<br>
 <br>No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and [sweepstakes casinos](https://globalairgunner.com/read-blog/20336_just-how-much-are-americans-investing-in-sports-betting.html) - the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style games and financially rewarding rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.<br>
 <br>The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to mention claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as traditional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal [sports betting](https://skylockr.app/read-blog/202_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.<br>
 <br>One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city suit that declares VGW uses celebrity endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)<br>
 <br>'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told [DailyMail](http://www.seferpanim.com/read-blog/382_why-every-cricket-fan-need-to-try-the-all-cricket-id-gaming-platform.html).com.<br>
 <br>Sweepstakes endorsers  of a range of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and [Paul George](https://youtoosocialnetwork.com/read-blog/1259_online-betting-firms-gamble-on-soccer-mad-nigeria.html) - none of whom offer any differences between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.<br>
 <br>Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online<br>
 <br>Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are totally free<br>
 <br>Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he [routinely touts](https://zekond.com/read-blog/112505_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) on social media<br>
 <br>Learn more<br>[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig)
 <br>Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'<br>
 <br>Instead, ads usually focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the capacity for real gambling losses.<br>
 <br>Others lure clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad flaunting Drake's cars, airplanes and mansions before pivoting to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.<br>
 <br>'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.<br>
 <br>Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever quit.'<br>
 <br>The discrepancy in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.<br>
 <br>A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in [direct competition](https://sossnet.com/read-blog/20547_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on [social-sweepstakes casinos](http://www.engel-und-waisen.de/index.php/Benutzer:BartFurr7558266) are [sports betting](https://younivix.com/read-blog/29894_warner-bros-discovery-sets-stage-for-potential-cable-deal-by.html) totally free.<br>
 <br>'Most social sweeps consumers never ever purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'<br>[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG)
 <br>Social casinos use consumers a possibility to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the alternative to buy worthless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be [exchanged](https://wiki.vifm.info/index.php/User:Jimmy50739) for real cash, however can be used to open numerous functions within the games.<br>
 <br>But within the world of social gambling establishments [exists sweepstakes](https://vodagram.com/index.php?link1=read-blog&id=376_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html) gaming, allowing clients to get other currency referred to as ['sweeps coins'](https://gamehiker.com/wiki/index.php/User:MarinaPack253) that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.<br>
 <br>And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.<br>
 <br>The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event<br>
 <br>Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates<br>
 <br>Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker<br>
 <br>Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has actually helped to sustain the popularity of [sweepstakes casinos](https://marketchat.in/read-blog/2596_online-betting-firms-gamble-on-soccer-mad-nigeria.html).<br>
 <br>Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need usually need identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.<br>
 <br>Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to submit mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, consequently providing a reason to try their hands at any [variety](https://www.miptrucking.net/read-blog/1269_tennessee-sports-betting-top-4-legal-betting-sites-in-2024.html) of gambling establishment games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.<br>
 <br>So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?<br>
 <br>According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a means of promoting their support.<br>
 <br>'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important distinction in between social sweeps and standard online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'<br>
 <br>Consider the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the chance to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.<br>
 <br>And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.<br>
 <br>'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of daily companies in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'<br>
 <br>But to lots of gambling industry experts, that argument doesn't cut it.<br>
 <br>For starters, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.<br>[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig)
 <br>'They don't last permanently and they're typically not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach informed [DailyMail](https://mysuccessdarpan.com/read-blog/12326_enhance-your-business-opportunities-with-efficient-sports-apps.html).com. 'They're simply money free gifts.<br>
 <br>'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the characteristics typically associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payout portion for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the earnings made by the [business](https://gamehiker.com/wiki/index.php/User:RoseannaBergstro) [generally less than one percent]'<br>
 <br>Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, [offering consumers](https://aceme.ink/read-blog/1646_score-big-wins-how-sports-betting-software-drives-growth-and-engagement.html) the possibility to play casino-style [video games](http://video.firstkick.live/read-blog/4647_exploring-the-sports-betting-industry-putting-ideas-into-practice.html) for real prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have given that been shuttered over accusations of [illegal gaming](https://tartar.app/read-blog/1671_how-are-betting-odds-calculated.html).<br>
 <br>DJ Khaled is among a number of star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name<br>
 <br>Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should face comparable scrutiny.<br>
 <br>'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as essential aspects in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for unlawful [sports betting](https://wiki.rrtn.org/wiki/index.php/User:KLALona208).'<br>
 <br>Among the casino industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.<br>
 <br>'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and earnings opportunities as this gambling replaces that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.<br>
 <br>And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.<br>
 <br>Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.<br>
 <br>Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker<br>
 <br>In the most current claim, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '<br>
 <br>Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's request for comment.<br>
 <br>'We generally do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.<br>
 <br>'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only great games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.<br>
 <br>'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to vigorously defend any claim which might be brought against us.'<br>
 <br>The issues between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show problematic for some celeb endorsers.<br>
 <br>Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.<br>
 <br>'It's ironic that expert athletes are [hawking](https://wiki.monnaie-libre.fr/wiki/Utilisateur:CorinneWashburn) unlawful [sports betting](https://welcometohaiti.com/read-blog/15320_how-to-play-bet9ja-online.html) 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues wish to project a strong position versus unlawful [sports betting](https://gamehiker.com/wiki/index.php/User:MarinaPack253) - specifically when trying to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser told [DailyMail](https://micircle.in/read-blog/455_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html).com.<br>
 <br>It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with [bettors](https://uptoscreen.com/read-blog/74148_exploring-the-sports-betting-industry-putting-ideas-into-practice.html). However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes [gambling establishments](https://younivix.com/read-blog/29894_warner-bros-discovery-sets-stage-for-potential-cable-deal-by.html).<br>[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG)
 <br>In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently unlawful gambling websites<br>
 <br>Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.<br>
 <br>'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.<br>
 <br>Neither an NBA representative nor the players' representatives responded to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, [Seacrest](https://nuo18.lt/read-blog/68713_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.<br>
 <br>Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.<br>
 <br>'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our [organization practices](https://cheere.org/read-blog/36300_the-history-of-the-nfl-and-how-to-bank-on-it.html) more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our worths are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'<br>
 <br>Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.<br>
 <br>'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal gaming.'<br>
 <br>New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton<br>